Roman identity in all its variety and ambiguity is a fascinating test case for the study of social identity in general: it could be civic, political, imperial, juridical, cultural, territorial, religious and also ethnic; self-designation and outside perceptions could differ considerably. After the Western Roman Empire had dissolved and ‘central Romanness’ lost its hegemony, the variety of ‘Roman’ forms of identification increased further: for instance, Greek-speaking subjects of the Byzantine Empire; inhabitants of the city of Rome; citizens living according to Roman law; Latin speakers under ‘barbarian’ rule in the West; or, increasingly, representatives of the Church of Rome. ‘Roman’ also changed its significance in many ways. In the Western tradition, Rome was seen as an example for a non-ethnic nation, defined by the legal status of its citizens and not by their common blood; in the Latin terminology of the period, as a populus and not as a gens. Now, increasingly, Romans could be seen as one gens among many. While the powerful forms of representation and a political language that the Roman state created deeply influenced all successive European polities, the majority of ‘Romans’ (or Walchen, Vlachs, Welsh, as they were called by others) in many parts of Europe became low-status or dependent groups.
This little-researched topic still presents a challenge; in the context of the ERC Grant project SCIRE, substantial progress was made:
Walter Pohl (Projektleiter)
Cinzia Grifoni (Projektmitglied)
Clemens Gantner (Projektmitglied)
Ingrid Hartl (Projektmitglied)
Marianne Pollheimer (Projektmitglied)