Abstract
Media and journalism are expected to fulfill an important social function by contributing to the self-observation of modern societies. However, the realization of this function is often aggravated by various context factors: Current debates about politically charged catchwords like “fake news” provide evidence of an eroding trust in professional media actors around the globe. The progressing economization of newswork threatens the financial basis of journalism. And technological change leads to further new challenges: Can journalistic information be reliable at all in a time of digital content production?
In this situation, many media scholars – as well as practitioners – are calling for a fundamental redefinition of journalism’s identity and its professional purpose. Rather than following the general obsession with speed, which is characteristic for many online news platforms, they argue that deceleration is the key to help journalism (re)gain trust – and to fulfill its social function in the best possible way. Particularly high hopes are nourished by the approach of a narrative journalism, using literary techniques that are often said to have multifaceted positive effects – for example in order to generate attention for certain topics and communicate them in a most comprehensible manner. At the same time, however, literary approaches to journalism regularly cause considerable criticism, particularly when they contribute to blurring the sacred boundaries between fact and fiction.
Although the research about literary journalism has a long tradition, particularly in the Anglo-Saxon world, the concept is not widespread in the German-speaking world. The project “Telling it right: The ethics of narrative journalism” tries to tackle this void with a succession theoretical and empirical studies that illuminate both the traditions and the present of literary journalism in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. A special focus is put on the normative challenges of journalistic storytelling that can be illustrated, for example, with the help of an analysis of the recent case of the pseudo-reporter Claas Relotius.
Financing
Own funds
Cooperation Partners
University of Bamberg, Institute for Communication Studies
International Association for Literary Journalism Studies (IALJS)
Lectures
-
San Cristóbal de La Laguna
Transparencia corporativa y medios: Un estudio comparativo de Austria y España [Corporate transparency and the media: A comparative study of Austria and Spain]
Palau Sampio, M. D. (Speaker), Eberwein, T. (Speaker) & Krakovsky, C. (Speaker)
1 Dec 2025 -
Paris
User participation is both the problem and the cure! A nuanced view on web-based media accountability processes
Eberwein, T. (Speaker)
11 Jul 2019 -
Madrid
De-westernizing media accountability research
Fengler, S. (Contributor), Eberwein, T. (Speaker) & Speck, D. (Contributor)
8 Jul 2019 -
St. Petersburg
Transformations of media self-regulation - a comparative view
Eberwein, T. (Speaker), Fengler, S. (Contributor) & Karmasin, M. (Speaker)
12 Apr 2017 -
Düsseldorf
Vernetzung der Medien(selbst)regulierung: Eine vergleichende Analyse von Media-Accountability-Strukturen in 30 europäischen Staaten [Networks of media (self-)regulation. A comparative analysis of media accountability structures in 30 European states]
Eberwein, T. (Speaker), Fengler, S. (Contributor) & Karmasin, M. (Speaker)
31 Mar 2017 -
University of New York in Prague
Media accountability in Europe. Results from a 33-country study
Eberwein, T. (Speaker), Fengler, S. (Contributor) & Karmasin, M. (Speaker)
8 Nov 2016 -
Bocconi University, Milan
The accountable journalist 2.0. Monitoring newsroom responsibility in the digital age
Eberwein, T. (Speaker)
6 Oct 2016 -
Fukuoka
Measuring media accountability in Europe: A comparative study of infrastructures of media self-regulation in 30 European states
Eberwein, T. (Speaker), Fengler, S. (Contributor), Kaufmann, K. (Speaker), Brinkmann, J. (Contributor) & Karmasin, M. (Speaker)
10 Jun 2016 -
Lissabon
Beyond the system boundary: Towards a transcultural theory of media accountability.
Eberwein, T. (Speaker), Fengler, S. (Contributor) & Karmasin, M. (Speaker)
13 Nov 2014 -
Passau
(Selbst-) Regulierung digitaler Öffentlichkeit(en). Medienpolitische Implikationen einer internationalen Vergleichsstudie [(Self-) regulation of digital public(s). Media-political implications of an international comparative study]
Eberwein, T. (Speaker), Fengler, S. (Contributor) & Karmasin, M. (Speaker)
28 May 2014 -
Münster
Redaktionelle Transparenz und Vertrauen in Journalismus. Ergebnisse einer komparativen Kommunikatorstudie [Editorial transparency and trust in journalism. Results of a comparative communicator study]
Karmasin, M. (Speaker), Fengler, S. (Contributor), Lönnendonker, J. (Contributor), Willner, A.-K. (Contributor) & Eberwein, T. (Speaker)
22 Feb 2014 -
Konferenzzentrum des ZDF, Mainz
Grenzenlose Journalismusethik? Journalisten und ihre Einstellung zu Medienselbstkontrolle und Media Accountability - eine internationale Vergleichsstudie
Karmasin, M. (Speaker) & Fengler, S. (Contributor)
10 May 2013 -
Hochschule für Philosophie, München
Eine Frage des Gewissens? Zur Wirksamkeit journalistischer Selbstregulierung unter den Bedingungen des Medienwandels
Karmasin, M. (Speaker), Fengler, S. (Contributor), Eberwein, T. (Contributor), Porlezza, C. (Contributor) & Ruß-Mohl, S. (Contributor)
14 Feb 2013
Books and Monographs
- Media accountability in the era of post-truth politics. European challenges and perspectives. / Eberwein, T (Herausgeber:in); Fengler, S (Herausgeber:in); Karmasin, M (Herausgeber:in).
London, New York: Routledge, 2019. (Routledge Studies in European Communication Research and Education).
Articles and Book Chapters
- Ethik in Echtzeit: Herausforderungen für die Terrorberichterstattung unter digitalen Vorzeichen am Beispiel von #wienterror [Ethics in real time: Challenges for terror reporting under digital conditions – the case of #wienterror]. / Saurwein, F; Eberwein, T; Karmasin, M et al.
Regulierung, Governance und Medienethik in der digitalen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2024. S. 289-307 (Springer VS Wiesbaden). - Vernetzung der Medien(selbst)regulierung. Eine vergleichende Analyse von Media-Accountability-Strukturen in 30 europäischen Staaten [Integrating media (self) regulation. A comparative analysis of media accountability structures in 30 European countries]. / Eberwein, Tobias; Fengler, Susanne; Karmasin, Matthias et al.
Vernetzung. Stabilität und Wandel gesellschaftlicher Kommunikation. Köln: Herbert von Halem, 2018. S. 268-287. - Medienverantwortung und journalistische Transparenz: Optionen für Redaktionen im digitalen Umbruch [Media responsibility and journalistic transparency: Options for newsrooms in the digital transformation]. / Eberwein, Tobias; Evers, Huub; Groenhart, Harmen et al.
Anonymität und Transparenz in der Digitalen Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2015. S. 117-131. - Praktisch wirkungslos? Perspektiven einer angewandten Medienethik [Practically ineffective? Perspectives of applied media ethics]. / Eberwein, Tobias; Fengler, Susanne; Karmasin, Matthias et al.
Vom Praktisch-Werden der Ethik in interdisziplinärer Sicht: Ansätze und Beispiele der Institutionalisierung, Konkretisierung und Implementierung der Ethik. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, 2015. S. 85-104. - Eine Frage des Gewissens? Zur Wirksamkeit journalistischer Selbstregulierung unter den Bedingungen des Medienwandels [A question of the conscience? The effectiveness of journalistic self-regulation under the conditions of media change]. / Eberwein, Tobias; Fengler, Susanne; Karmasin, Matthias et al.
Neuvermessung der Medienethik: Bilanz, Themen und Herausforderungen seit 2000. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa, 2015. S. 223-242. - Journalistic quality as crowd wisdom? What journalists think about criticism on the social web. / Eberwein, Tobias; Scheiber, Martin (Herausgeber:in); Zimmermann, Clemens (Herausgeber:in).
Journalism and technological change: Historical perspectives, contemporary trends. New York: Campus, 2014. S. 205-224. - Journalists, journalism ethics and media accountability: A comparative survey of 14 European and Arab countries. / Fengler, Susanne; Eberwein, Tobias; Lönnendonker, Julia et al.
The ethics of journalism: Individual, institutional and cultural influences. London: I.B.Tauris, 2014. S. 85-105. - Grenzenlose Journalismusethik? Medienselbstkontrolle und Media Accountability im internationalen Vergleich [Journalism ethics without borders? Media self-regulation and media accountability - an international comparison]. / Fengler, Susanne; Eberwein, Tobias; Karmasin, Matthias et al.
Von der Gutenberg-Galaxis zur Google-Galaxis: Alte und neue Grenzvermessungen nach 50 Jahren DGPuK. Konstanz: UVK, 2014. S. 269-287. - Wahrnehmung kommunikativer Verantwortung. Wie die Top 50 Unternehmen der D-A-CH-Region wirtschaftsethische Themen im Web behandeln und aufarbeiten [Perception of communicative responsibility. How the top 50 enterprises of the D-A-CH-Region treat and handle economic-ethical subjects in the web]. / Koinig, Isabell; Weder, Franzisca; Karmasin, Matthias.
in: MedienJournal, Jahrgang 38, Nr. 1, 15.04.2014, S. 52-68. - Stakeholder-Management als kommunikatives Beziehungsmanagement: Netzwerktheoretische Grundlagen der Unternehmenskommunikation [Stakeholder management as a communicative relation management: Network-theoretical bases of the enterprise communication]. / Karmasin, Matthias; Weder, Franziska; Zerfaß, Ansgar (Herausgeber:in) et al.
Handbuch der Unternehmenskommunikation: Strategie - Management - Wertschöpfung. Wiesbaden: Springer/Gabler, 2014. S. 81-105.
Research Papers
Popular Publications
Popular Talks
-
Brüssel
Media accountability and recommendations for European policy makers
Karmasin, M. (Speaker)
6 Jun 2013 -
Brüssel
Media monitoring for Europe?
Karmasin, M. (Speaker)
6 Jun 2013