Scientific expertise plays a central role in the Corona crisis. However, their organization and political function have not yet been systematically studied. In this project, empirical research is used to identify the challenges that arise for institutional policy advice in protracted crises. The basis for this is an international comparison (Austria, Germany, Great Britain).
Especially in national and global crises elicited by novel risks, scientific expertise is the most important resource for political decision-making. The Corona pandemic has once again made this clear. It therefore raises the question of what requirements scientific policy advice must meet in order to be able to serve as an effective information and legitimation resource for government and administration in such crises; in view of notorious uncertainty in crisis situations, much depends on the public’s trust in experts.
The (hitherto unexplored) basic question of whether the Austrian policy advisory model meets the requirements of global crises motivates the planned project. The project examines how Corona-specific expertise is organised, produced and used politically in Austria. In a second step, the Austrian way of providing policy advice will be compared with relevant experiences in other European countries (Germany, UK). Therefore, from a political-practical point of view, it becomes clear what challenges chronic crises (like the nuclear dispute in the past or the climate crisis today) pose for institutional policy advice – and what need for reform this special situation may formulate for current practice.
By systematically and internationally comparing the organisation, negotiation and political function of Corona-specific advisory bodies, the project thus contributes to revealing the benefits and shortcomings of the Austrian model. It thus provides an important prerequisite for consolidating the knowledge base of decision-makers. In other words, the project contributes to ensure epistemic certainty in global crises.
-> Krisen wie die COVID-19-Pandemie stellen Wissenschaft und Politik vor neue Herausforderungen. -> Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung informiert Verwaltung und Politik, ihre Güte und Effizienz hängt von unterschiedlichen Kriterien ab. -> Um Effizienz zu steigern und Vertrauen zu schaffen, muss wissenschaftliche Politikberatung transparent gestaltet sein. -> Gleichzeitig wird Vertrauen während chronischer Krisen gestärkt, wenn vielfältige Perspektiven berücksichtigt werden. -> Um adäquate Beratung zu ermöglichen, ist eine Ausstattung mit ausreichenden Ressourcen unerlässlich.
-> Crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic confront science and politics with new challenges. -> Scientific policy advice informs administration and politics, and its quality and effectiveness depend on various criteria. -> In order to increase efficiency and createtrust, scientific policy advice must be transparent. -> At the same time, trust is strengthened during chronic crises when a variety of perspectives are taken into account. -> In order to provide adequate advice, it is essential that sufficient resources are available.