Reading Machiavelli : : Scandalous Books, Suspect Engagements, and the Virtue of Populist Politics / / John P. McCormick.
To what extent was Machiavelli a "Machiavellian"? Was he an amoral adviser of tyranny or a stalwart partisan of liberty? A neutral technician of power politics or a devout Italian patriot? A reviver of pagan virtue or initiator of modern nihilism? Reading Machiavelli answers these question...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter EBOOK PACKAGE COMPLETE 2018 English |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2018] ©2018 |
Year of Publication: | 2018 |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (288 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Other title: | Frontmatter -- Contents -- Abbreviations for Machiavelli's Writings -- Introduction. Vulgarity and Virtuosity -- Part I -- 1. The Passion of Duke Valentino: Cesare Borgia, Biblical Allegory, and The Prince -- 2. "Keep the Public Rich and the Citizens Poor": Economic Inequality and Political Corruption in the Discourses -- 3. On the Myth of a Conservative Turn in the Florentine Histories -- Part II -- 4. Rousseau's Repudiation of Machiavelli's Democratic Roman Republic -- 5. Leo Strauss's Machiavelli and the Querelle between the Few and the Many -- 6. The Cambridge School's "Guicciardinian Moments" Revisited -- Summation. Scandalous Writings, Dubious Readings, and the Virtues of Popular Empowerment -- Notes -- Acknowledgments -- Index -- A NOTE ON THE TYPE |
---|---|
Summary: | To what extent was Machiavelli a "Machiavellian"? Was he an amoral adviser of tyranny or a stalwart partisan of liberty? A neutral technician of power politics or a devout Italian patriot? A reviver of pagan virtue or initiator of modern nihilism? Reading Machiavelli answers these questions through original interpretations of Niccolò Machiavelli's three major political works-The Prince, Discourses, and Florentine Histories-and demonstrates that a radically democratic populism seeded the Florentine's scandalous writings. John McCormick challenges the misguided understandings of Machiavelli set forth by prominent thinkers, including Jean-Jacques Rousseau and representatives of the Straussian and Cambridge schools.McCormick emphasizes the fundamental, often unacknowledged elements of a vibrant Machiavellian politics: the utility of vigorous class conflict between elites and common citizens for virtuous democratic republics, the necessity of political and economic equality for genuine civic liberty, and the indispensability of religious tropes for the exercise of effective popular judgment. Interrogating the established reception of Machiavelli's work by such readers as Rousseau, Leo Strauss, Quentin Skinner, and J.G.A. Pocock, McCormick exposes what was effectively an elite conspiracy to suppress the Florentine's contentious, egalitarian politics. In recovering the too-long-concealed quality of Machiavelli's populism, this book acts as a Machiavellian critique of Machiavelli scholarship.Advancing fresh renderings of works by Machiavelli while demonstrating how they have been misread previously, Reading Machiavelli presents a new outlook for how politics should be conceptualized and practiced. |
Format: | Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. |
ISBN: | 9780691187914 9783110604252 9783110603255 9783110604214 9783110603217 9783110606591 |
DOI: | 10.1515/9780691187914?locatt=mode:legacy |
Access: | restricted access |
Hierarchical level: | Monograph |
Statement of Responsibility: | John P. McCormick. |