Daniela Fuchs

MSc BA

▼Projects | ▼Publications | ▼Contact

About

Having completed her studies in Human Ecology, Daniela Fuchs began working as Junior Scientist at the Institute of Technology Assessment in 2014 (until 2020), and again in October 2021. Currently, she is working on questions of scientific expertise in crises and on issues of transparency for artificial intelligence.

Education and Career

Daniela Fuchs studied Biology with a focus on Human Ecology at the University of Vienna and the Free University of Brussels, as well as History at the University in Vienna (B.A.). In her master thesis (MSc) she analyzed the possible application of green design principles to, and the importance of sustainability issues for nanotechnologies in selected research facilities in Austria and Germany. Currently, she is working on her doctoral dissertation on the governance of emerging technologies.

After several internships in different fields of technology assessment, she started working on the ITA project  NanoTrust. In her first years at ITA, she worked on issues of public and stakeholder engagement in context of new and emerging technologies (neuroenhancement, synthetic biology, nanotechnology), and the role of computational modelling for policy advice. From January to September 2021, she investigated sustainability issues of emerging photovoltaics in the project SolarCircle at the University of Life Sciences (BOKU) in Vienna.

Projects

TA Projects

TA Projects

Oct 2021 - Jan 2022

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence applications are widely used. They provide a basis for decision-making and often decide for themselves. A new ITA study asks how AI can be explained in a comprehensible way and how risks can be identified in order to respond to concerns.

[Translate to English:]
Oct 2021 - Mar 2023

Epistemic Security (EPISTEMIS)

On Scientific Expertise in Chronic Crises

Jun 2018 - May 2020

Computational modelling for policy advice

Empirical insights into computer modelling and simulations in various policy areas

Sep 2017 - Aug 2020

GoNano

Societal engagement in the development of nanotechnology applications

Jul 2016 - Mar 2018

Pol[ITA] - Policy Advice in TA

Practices and paradigms of policy advice in TA

Jan 2016 - Feb 2018

PROSO

PROmoting SOcietal Engagement under the terms of RRI [Förderung der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung für verantwortungsvolle Forschung und Innovation]

© iStockPhoto
Apr 2014 - Mar 2015

NanoMia

Nanomaterials in Waste: Evaluation of Rules and Scenarios for the verification of nanomaterials in waste streams

Mar 2013 - May 2016

NERRI

Verantwortungsvolle Forschung und Innovation bei Neuroenhancement

Publikationen

Refereed Contributions

Referierte Beiträge

  • Bauer, A., Bogner, A., & Fuchs, D. (2021). Rethinking societal engagement under the heading of Responsible Research and Innovation: (novel) requirements and challenges. Journal Of Responsible Innovation, 8 (1), 1-22. doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1909812
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Kastenhofer, K., Capari, L., Fuchs, D., & Peissl, W. (2019). „Wes Brot ich ess, des Lied ich sing”? TA und ihre Auftraggeber. Tatup – Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung In Theorie Und Praxis, 28, 33-38. doi:10.14512/tatup.28.1.33
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Nentwich, M., & Fuchs, D. (2018). 30 Jahre Institut für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Geistes-, Sozial- Und Kulturwissenschaftlicher Anzeiger Der Öaw, 153, 5-68; online first: 5/12/2018. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/0xc1aa5576_0x003a0519.pdf
    WebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Bechtold, U., Fuchs, D., & Gudowsky, N. (2017). Introduction: Imagining socio-technical futures – challenges and opportunities for technology assessment. Journal Of Responsible Innovation, 4, 85-99. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1364617
    DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract

    An increasing orientation of technology assessment (TA) and adjacent fields toward future socio-technological developments is leading scholars to examine, assess and adapt different approaches of future studies on various levels. In this special issue of the Journal of Responsible Innovation, a number of members of the extended TA community in Europe seek to advance different approaches to handling the unpredictable, to consider various possible socio-technical futures and to explore a more active role in technology design and shaping of the future as required by concepts such as responsible innovation (RI) or responsible research and innovation (RRI). The three German words ‘Zukunft Macht Technik’ (the title of a TA conference in Vienna in 2015) make a nice little pun in German: they can either be interpreted as the short sentence ‘Future shapes technology’ or as the assembly of the three nouns ‘future power technology.’ Both readings are borne in mind in this special issue. A main insight of this special issue is that we need to explore how the debate on imagined socio-technical futures is enriched by concepts such as R(R)I, taking into account that no future can exist without an awareness of the present setting of innovation processes and technology development.

  • Torgersen, H., & Fuchs, D. (2017). Technology assessment as a myth buster: deconstructing myths around emerging technologies. Journal Of Responsible Innovation, 4, 118-137. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1320157
    DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract

    Responsible Research and Innovation requires the debating of emerging technologies ‘upstream’. In discussions on radically novel technologies, comparisons with older technologies are often drawn. This leads to a transfer of assigned properties in the creation of rhetoric so that the new technology appears as a derivative of the older. Sometimes, several comparator technologies are at hand which may give the new technology a different image. Depending on the choices taken in rhetoric creation, a group of actors may acquire advantages over other groups, thereby establishing power relations and sometimes deciding the fate of the technology in question. In this paper, we analyse these processes through a ‘hermeneutic’ upstream technology assessment (TA) lens, while applying Roland Barthes’ concept of myths creation. Using the case examples of synthetic biology and neuro-enhancement, we highlight the importance of the role of comparators and the multilayered character of myths. The potential role of TA as a ‘myth buster’ may render another task of TA, namely, stimulating a public debate, more difficult because the issue at stake may appear less salient.

  • Bauer, A., Bogner, A., Capari, L., Fuchs, D., Gudowsky, N., Kastenhofer, K., Ornetzeder, M., Peissl, W., & Sinozic, T. (2016). Schlaue Gedanken zu smarter Technik, Konferenzbericht von der TA16. Tatup - Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung In Theorie Und Praxis, 25, 79-86. doi:10.14512/tatup.25.2.91
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Gazsó, A., Fuchs, D., Greßler, S., Gruber, I., Part, F., & Huber-Humer, M. (2015). Environmentally Relevant Aspects of Nanomaterials in Products at the End-of-life Phase. European Journal Of Risk Regulation, 6, 638-645. doi:10.1017/S1867299X00005195
    DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Fuchs, D., & Gazsó, A. (2015). Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case. International Journal Of Performability Engineering, Special Issue 'Risk Communication And Risk Governance', 11, 569-576. doi:10.23940/ijpe.15.6.p569.mag
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • 1

Articles/Book contributions

Artikel/Buchbeiträge

  • Nentwich, M., & Fuchs Daniela,. (2021). Three decades of institutionalised TA in Austria (ITA-manu:script 21-01). doi:10.1553/ITA-ms-21-01
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Daniela Fuchs,, Anja Bauer,, & Alexander Bogner,. (2021). Nur kein Protest? Eingeladene Partizipation und Bedingungenzivilgesellschaftlicher Beteiligung. In R. Lindner, Decker, M., Ehrensperger, E., Heyen, N. B., Lingner, S., Scherz, C., & Sotoudeh, M. (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Transformationen - Gegenstand oder Aufgabe der Technikfolgenabschätzung? (pp. 219-230). Baden-Baden: nomos. Retrieved from https://www.nomos-shop.de/titel/gesellschaftliche-transformationen-id-86476/
    WebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Lösch, A., Böhle, K., Coenen, C., Dobroc, P., Ferrari, A., Heil, R., Hommrich, D., Sand, M., Schneider, C., Aykut, S., Dickel, S., Fuchs, D., Gransche, B., Grundwald, A., Hausstein, a., Kastenhofer, K., Konrad, K., Nordmann, A., Schaper-Rinkel, P., Scheer, D., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Torgersen, H., & Wentland, A. (2019). Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Futures – A Discussion Paper. In A. G. A. Lösch M. Meister (Ed.), Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present. Emprirical Examples and Analytical Challenges. (pp. 285-302). Wiesbaden: Springer. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658271541
    WebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Bogner, A., Bauer, A., & Fuchs, D. (2018). Partizipation als große Herausforderung. Neue Formen der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung im Kontext von 'Responsible Research and Innovation'. (M. Decker, Lindner, R., Lingner, S., Scherz, C., & Sotoudeh, M., Eds.), NTA7 Proceedings: "Grand Challenges" meistern – der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Baden-Baden: Nomos – edition sigma. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845283562-11
    WebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Fuchs, D., Capari, L., & Torgersen, H. (2018). Neuroenhancement und TA-Verantwortung. (M. Decker, Lindner, R., Lingner, S., Scherz, C., & Sotoudeh, M., Eds.), NTA7 Proceedings: "Grand Challenges" meistern – der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Baden-Baden: Nomos – edition sigma. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845283562-11
    WebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Lösch, A., Böhle, K., Coenen, C., Dobroć, P., Ferrari, A., Heil, R., Hommrich, D., Sand, M., Schneider, C., Aykut, S., Dickel, S., Fuchs, D., Gransche, B., Grunwald, A., Hausstein, A., Kastenhofer, K., Konrad, K., Nordmann, A., Schaper-Rinkel, P., Scheer, D., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Torgersen, H., & Wentland, A. (2016). Technikfolgenabschätzung von soziotechnischen Zukünften. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-papers/loesch-et-al-2016-technikfolgenabschaetzung-von-soziotechnischen-zukuenften.pdf
    WebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Gazsó, A., & Fuchs, D. (2016). Nano Risk Governance. Extending the Limits of Regulatory Approaches through Expert Dialogues. (C. Scherz, Michalek, T., Hennen, L., Hebáková, L., Hahn, J., & Seitz, S., Eds.). Prague: Technology Centre ASCR. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/pacita/pacita-2015-conference-proceedings.pdf
    WebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Bechtold, U., Fuchs, D., & Gudowsky, N. (2015). Zukünfte und Technologieentwicklung – Wechselseitige Beeinflussung als Herausforderung für die Technikfolgenabschätzung. Bericht von der TA’15-Jahrestagung „Zukunft, Macht, Technik“, Institut für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung an der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 24, 121-124. Retrieved from https://www.tatup-journal.de/tatup153_beua15a.php
    WebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Gudowsky, N., Sotoudeh, M., Bogner, A., Fuchs, D., Mager, A., Stemberger, S., Krieger-Lamina, J., Strauß, S., Torgersen, H., Wächter, P., & Zinner, H. (2014). Responsible Research und TA – Innovationen neu gestalten. Bericht von der 6. Konferenz des Netzwerks TA und der 14. Jahreskonferenz des ITA Wien (NTA6-TA14). Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie Und Praxis (Tatup), 23, 106-110. Retrieved from http://www.tatup-journal.de/tatup143_guua14a.php
    WebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Fuchs, D. (2014). Green nano und der Forschungsalltag – Niederschlag eines Konzepts in der aktuellen Nanotechnologie-Umweltforschung. In A. Gazsó & Haslinger, J. (Eds.), Nano Risiko Governance: Der Gesellschaftliche Umgang mit Nanotechnologien (pp. 81-98). Wien: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-7091-1405-6_4
    WebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract

    Zur Entwicklung der Nanotechnologie in Richtung Nachhaltigkeit gilt es, abstrakte Konzepte zu konkretisieren und in den Produktionsprozess, angefangen bei der Forschung und Entwicklung, einzubinden um eine langfristige Ausrichtung zu ermöglichen (Leitbild-Konzept). Im vorliegenden Artikel wird die Entwicklung eines solchen Konzepts zur grünen Nanotechnologie, die green nano Designprinzipien, kurz umrissen um sich in der Folge ihrer Umsetzung im Forschungsalltag im Bereich Nano-Umwelttechnik und einigen beispielhaften Anwendungen in diesem Bereich zu widmen.
    Trotz einer zunehmenden Wichtigkeit von Umwelt- und Risikofragen auch in der Nanotechnologieforschung bleibt der Transfer von einer konzeptuellen Ebene im Fall der Designprinzipien in die Forschungslabors beschränkt.

  • 1

Books/Editorships

Bücher und Herausgeberschaften

  • Bechtold, U., Fuchs, D., & Gudowsky, N. (Eds.). (2017). JRI Special Issue: ‘Into the Wild: Futures and Responsibilities in Technology Assessment’ (p. 215). Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tjri20/4/2?nav=tocList
    WebsiteRISENWBIB
  • 1

Research Reports

Forschungsberichte

  • Pavlicek, A., Mesbahi, Z., Gazsó, A., Rose, G., & Fuchs, D. (2022). Advanced Materials (NanoTrust-Dossier No 058en - June 2022) (p. 6). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ita-nt-058en
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Udrea, T., Fuchs, D., & Peissl, W. (2022). Künstliche Intelligenz. Verstehbarkeit und Transparenz – Endbericht (p. 77). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-2022-01
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Greßler, S., Part, F., Pavlicek, A., Fuchs, D., Scharber, M., Sarıçiftçi, N. S., Rodin, V., Moser, S., Lindorfer, J., & Ehmoser, E. -K. (2022). Advanced Materials for innovative solar cell technologies. Part II: Sustainability assessment and significance in the circular economy (NanoTrust-Dossier No 057en - February 2022) (p. 7). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ita-nt-057en
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Mesbahi, Z., Gazsó, A., Rose, G., Fuchs, D., & Pavlicek, A. (2022). Advanced Materials (NanoTrust-Dossier Nr. 058 - Jänner 2022) (p. 6). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ita-nt-058
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Scharber, M., Rodin, V., Moser, S., Greßler, S., Part, F., Pavlicek, A., Fuchs, D., Sarıçiftçi, N. S., Lindorfer, J., & Ehmoser, E. -K. (2021). Advanced Materials for innovative solar cell technologies. Part I: Fundamentals, historical development and market potentials(NanoTrust-Dossier No 056en - November 2021) (p. 7). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ita-nt-056en
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Greßler, S., Part, F., Pavlicek, A., Fuchs, D., Scharber, M., Serdar Sarıçiftçi, N., Rodin, V., Moser, S., Lindorfer, J., & Ehmoser, E. -K. (2021). "Advanced Materials" für innovative Solarzelltechnologie - Teil 2 (NanoTrust-Dossier Nr. 057 - September 2021) (p. 6). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ita-nt-057
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Scharber, M., Rodin, V., Moser, S., Greßler, S., Pavlicek, A., Part, F., Fuchs, D., Sarıçiftçi, S. N., Lindorfer, J., & Ehmoser, E. -K. (2021). "Advanced Materials" für innovative Solarzelltechnologie - Teil 1 (NanoTrust-Dossier Nr. 056 - August 2021) (p. 7). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ita-nt-056
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Bechtold, U., Fuchs, D., & Borrmann, V. (2020). Collection of the GoNano policy and industry briefs Suggestions for realizing RRI conditions in nanotechnology research and innovation (GoNano Deliverable 5.5). Retrieved from http://gonano-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/GoNano-D5.5.pdf
    DownloadRISENWBIB
  • Bechtold, U., Fuchs, D., & Borrmann, V. (2020). Collection of the GoNano white papers. Suggestions for realizing RRI conditions in nanotechnology research and innovation (GoNano Deliverable 5.3) (p. 109). Wien. Retrieved from http://gonano-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/D5.3-Three-white-papers-with-suggestion-for-realising-RRI-conditions-in-nanotechnology-RI.pdf
    DownloadRISENWBIB
  • Bechtold, U., Fuchs, D., Azoulay, D., Corentin, D., Pimponi, D., & Porcari, A. (2019). Risk Governance and Research and Innovation priorities in nanotechnologies. Update on regulatory contexts and current political developments an briefing report for GoNano white papers (Deliverable 5.2) (p. 118). Wien. Retrieved from http://gonano-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/D5.2-Second-briefing-report-on-the-nanotechnology-RI-policy-context-as-input-to-developing-the-GoNano-white-papers.pdf
    DownloadRISENWBIB
  • Bechtold, U., Fuchs, D., & Bauer, A. (2018). Method and manuals for the pilot studies towards a GONANO co-creation approcach (GoNano Deliverable 2.1) (p. 118). Wien. Retrieved from http://gonano-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/2.1.pdf
    WebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • Bauer, A., Capari, L., Fuchs, D., Gazsó, A., Kastenhofer, K., Peissl, W., & Sinozic, T. (2018). Pol[ITA] – Politikberatung am ITA. Endbericht (p. 221). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ita-pb-polita
    DOIRISENWBIB
  • Bauer, A., Fuchs, D., & Schaber, F. (2018). Risk governance and research & innovation priorities in nanotechnologies - First briefing report with a focus on food, health and the energy sector (p. 67). Wien. Retrieved from http://gonano-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/5.1.pdf
    WebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB Abstract

    A number of concepts address safety-relevant issues of innovative materials and products. The Safe-by-Design (SbD) concept is one of these, and aims to take account of these safety issues early on and during the entire product development process. The nano-specific concepts of SbD are intended to address prevailing uncertainties about potential risks to the environment and human health at the beginning stages in the development of new nanomaterials and products. The basic assumption of the SbD concept is that risks can be reduced through the choice of materials, products, tools and technologies, making them as safe as possible. Particular attention is paid to the product development stage, when it is still possible to intervene to control the selection of these factors. In line with the precautionary principle, the early integration of safety in the innovation process is generally seen as desirable.

  • Chonkova, B. et al. (2017). Deliverable D4.2: National Reports – Citizen Panels. PROSO – Promoting Societal Engagement under the terms of RRI. University of Surrey. doi:/10.1553/ita-pb
    DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract

    Full list of authors: Chonkova, Blagovesta; Asenova, Desislava; Kozarev, Ventseslav; Bauer, Anja; Bogner, Alexander; Fuchs, Daniela; Hofmaier, Christian; Hampel, Jürgen; Seabra, Susana; Gonçalves, João; Porth, Emily; Timotijević, Lada; Raats, Monique

  • Porth, E., Peacock, M., Timotijević, L., Fuchs, D., Hofmaier, C., & Morrison, M. (2017). Deliverable D 3.3: Synthesis report specifying similarities and differences in stakeholder/actor perspectives. PROSO – Promoting Societal Engagement under the terms of RRI (Contributors: Monique Raats, Anja Bauer, Alexander Bogner) (p. 72). University of Surrey. doi:/10.1553/ita-pb
    DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Porth, E., Timotijević, L., Fuchs, D., & Hofmaier, C. (2017). Deliverable D3.2: Three reports on barriers and incentives for societal engagement under RRI, one for each R&I domain. PROSO – Promoting Societal Engagement under the terms of RRI (Contributors: Monique Raats, Anja Bauer, Alexander Bogner) (p. 106). University of Surrey. doi:/10.1553/ita-pb
    DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Bauer, A., Bogner, A., & Fuchs, D. (2016). Societal engagement under the terms of RRI, Deliverable D2.2 for the EU-project PROSO - Promoting Societal Engagement under the terms of RRI (p. 66). Vienna. doi:/10.1553/ita-pb
    DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Bauer, A., Bogner, A., & Fuchs, D. (2016). Report on the expert workshop “Contemporary experiences with societal engagement under the terms of RRI“, Deliverable D2.1 for the EU-project PROSO - Promoting Societal Engagement under the terms of RRI (p. 24). Vienna. doi:/10.1553/ita-pb
    DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Fuchs, D., Torgersen, H., & Bauer, A. (2015). Implementation Plan: Towards a White Paper on Neuroenhancement. Deliverable Report 4.1 for NERRI WP4: Governance of RRI. Wien.
    RISENWBIB
  • Fuchs, D. (2015). Green nano: Positive environmental effects through the use of nanotechnology (NanoTrust dossier No. 045en – May 2015) (p. 6). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ita-nt-045en
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB Abstract

    The green nano design principles developed by the German NanoCommission constitute an attempt to establish consensus-based guidelines for environmentally friendly and sustainable production. This initiative fits into the objective of international research and development policy (e.g., Responsible Research and Innovation, RRI) and shall enable to incorporate desired societal aspects into technology developments as soon as possible. The present dossier is concerned with the question to what extent a concept along those lines can contribute to environmentally friendly developments in the area of nanotechnology. For this purpose, it introduces research projects which have implemented certain aspects of the green nano design principles. Moreover, on the basis of technological and scientific research and development, the question is raised whether or not, and if so, to what extent concepts such as green nano design principles can support the incorporation of environmental aspects into research.

Conference Papers/Speeches

Konferenzbeiträge/Vorträge

  • Peissl, Walter (24.11.2022) Transparente KI – geht das? Was meinen wir damit?. Vortrag bei: Technikfolgenabschä̈tzung aus Arbeitnehmer:innenperspektive (AK Vorarlberg), Feldkirch/AUSTRIA <https://schaffarei.at/forschung/konferenzprogramm-2022/>.

    Website

  • Pavlicek, Anna; Fuchs, Daniela; Gazsó, André (17.11.2022) NanoTrust Advanced. Vortrag bei: NanoTrust Beitratssitzung 2022 (ITA), Wien/AUSTRIA.

  • Peissl, Walter (28.04.2022) Künstliche Intelligenz - Verstehbarkeit und Transparenz. Vortrag bei: Pressegespräch AK13 (Arbeiterkammer), online/Wien/AUSTRIA.

  • Peissl, Walter (21.04.2022) Künstliche Intelligenz – Verstehbarkeit und Transparenz. Vortrag bei: BAT-Klausur 2022: AI am Arbeitsplatz (Beirat für Arbeit und Technik), Wien/AUSTRIA.

  • Peissl, Walter; Udrea, Titus; Fuchs, Daniela (15.03.2022) Artificial intelligence - Explainability and transparency. Vortrag bei: Trustworthy AI? Not without Consumer Protection! (AK Europa, BEUC, BMSGPK), online/BELGIUM.

  • Bechtold, Ulrike; Fuchs, Daniela (17.11.2021) Co-creation as an example of revealing needs and creating value. Vortrag bei: Science & You. Thematic Workshop: Science & Policy (University of Lorraine), Metz/FRANCE.

  • Capari, Leo (20.08.2020) „I just want a number“– Science-Policy Interactions in Energy System Modelling. Vortrag bei: EASST4S Prague2020, Prague/Virtual/CZECH REPUBLIC <https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/ssss/ssss20/index.php?program_focus=view_paper&selected_paper_id=1657751&cmd=online_program_direct_link&sub_action=online_program>.

    Website

  • Bauer, A.; Capari, L.; Fuchs, D.; Udrea, T. (19.08.2020) Proliferation, Integration & Opening: Changing Evidence Practices in Modelling for Policy. Vortrag bei: Practicing Evidence – Evidencing Practice How is (Scientific) Knowledge Validated, Valued and Contested?, München/Virtual/GERMANY <https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/ssss/ssss20/index.php?program_focus=view_paper&selected_paper_id=1657719&cmd=online_program_direct_link&sub_action=online_program>.

    Website

  • Udrea, T.; Bauer, A.; Capari, L.; Fuchs, D. (19.08.2020) Bringing Models Home: External versus In-house Modelling Expertise within the EU Commission’s Trade Sustainability Assessments. Vortrag bei: EASST4S Prague2020, Prague/Virtual/CZECH REPUBLIC <https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/ssss/ssss20/index.php?program_focus=view_paper&selected_paper_id=1657719&cmd=online_program_direct_link&sub_action=online_program>.

    Website

  • Fuchs, Daniela (18.08.2020) Modelling as anticipation: how computational models stabilize ideas of risk governance. Vortrag bei: EASST4S Prague2020, Prague/Virtual/CZECH REPUBLIC <https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/ssss/ssss20/index.php?program_focus=view_paper&selected_paper_id=1657894&cmd=online_program_direct_link&sub_action=online_program>.

    Website

  • Udrea, T.; Capari, L.; Fuchs, D.; Bauer, A. (03.05.2020) Modelling in EU’s Trade Policy: The Case of Sustainability Impact Assessments. Vortrag bei: STS Conference Graz 2020, Graz/Virtual/AUSTRIA.

  • Bechtold, Ulrike; Fuchs, Daniela (10.03.2020) Von Partizipation zu Co-Creation: „Lessons learned“ aus der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung in den Debatten rund um Nanotechnologien. Vortrag bei: 12. Nanotrust-Tagung “Advanced Materials – Materials for the Future – Emerging issues” (Nanotrust), Wien/AUSTRIA.

  • Capari, Leo; Udrea, Titus; Fuchs, Daniela; Bauer, Anja (26.11.2019) The politics of models: socio-political discourses in the modelling of energy transition and transnational trade policies; EU Conference on modelling for policy support. Vortrag bei: EU Conference on modelling for policy support, Brussels/BELGIUM.

  • Udrea, Titus; Fuchs, Daniela; Capari, Leo; Bauer, Anja (05.11.2019) New Methods for TA -Computational Content Analysis: Experiences, Potentials and Challenges. Vortrag bei: 4th European Technology Assessment Conference, Bratislava/SLOVAKIA (Slovak Republic).

  • Bauer, Anja; Capari, Leo; Fuchs, Daniela; Udrea, Titus (04.11.2019) "Limits to .. predictive power” –policy advice in the age of computational modelling. Vortrag bei: 4th European Technology Assessment Conference, Bratislava/SLOVAKIA (Slovak Republic).

  • Capari, Leo; Udrea, Titus; Fuchs, Daniela; Bauer, Anja (04.11.2019) Using Automated Text Analysis Methods to Uncover Socio-Political Narratives within Computer Modelling and Simulations (CMS). Vortrag bei: 4th European Technology Assessment Conference, Bratislava/SLOVAKIA (Slovak Republic).

  • Daniela Fuchs, ; Anja Bauer, ; Leo Capari, ; Udrea, Titus (04.11.2019) The socio-political narratives of computer models: Insights from the modelling of trade policies, energy systems and the risks of nanotechnologies. Vortrag bei: 4th European TA conference, Bratislava/SLOVAKIA (Slovak Republic).

  • Fuchs, Daniela; Bauer, Anja; Bogner, Alexander (07.11.2018) Nur kein Protest? Perspektiven verantwortungsvoller Beteiligungspolitik. Vortrag bei: NTA8, Karlsruhe/GERMANY.

  • Bauer, Anja; Fuchs, Daniela; Bogner, Alexander (18.09.2018) If you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail: Technology bias in invited participation on emerging technologies. Vortrag bei: 2nd STS Austria Conference – Innovation and Societal Transformation: Science, Democracy, and Sustainable Futures, Klagenfurt/AUSTRIA.

  • Fuchs, Daniela (28.08.2018) Engaging critical voices under RRI – Opening up STI governance?. Vortrag bei: WTMC Summer School, Deursen-Dennenburg/NETHERLANDS.

Short Articles

Kurzbeiträge

  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2022). KI verstehen? ITA-Dossier Nr. 62 (April 2022; Autor*innen: Titus Udrea, Daniela Fuchs, Walter Peissl). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-062
    DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2021). Co-Creation: A challenging process. ITA-Dossier no. 56en (Dezember 2021; Authors: Ulrike Bechtold, Daniela Fuchs, Vera Borrman). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-056en
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB
  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2021). Gender and Diversity in (Nano)Tech Development ITA-Dossier no. 54en, (June 2021; Authors: Ulrike Bechtold, Daniela Fuchs, Vera Borrmann). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-054en
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB
  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2021). Ko-Kreation: Ein Prozess mit Herausforderungen ITA-Dossier Nr. 56 (Juni 2021; Autorinnen: Ulrike Bechtold, Daniela Fuchs, Vera Borrmann). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-056
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB
  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2021). Gender und Diversität in der (Nano-)Technik-Entwicklung ITA-Dossier Nr. 54 (März 2021; Autorinnen: Ulrike Bechtold, Daniela Fuchs). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-054
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB
  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2021). Modelling which future? ITA-Dossier no. 51 (January 2021; Authors: Daniela Fuchs, Anja Bauer, Leo Capari, Tituts Udrea). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-051en
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB
  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2020). Welche Zukunft modellieren? ITA-Dossier Nr. 51 (Dezember 2020; AutorInnen: Anja Bauer, Daniela Fuchs, Leo Capari, Tituts Udrea). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-051
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB
  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2018). Engagement? Yes, if we are heard! ITA-Dossier no. 32en (March 2018; Authors: Anja Bauer, Daniela Fuchs, Alexander Bogner). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-032en
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB Abstract

    -> Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) calls for continuous societal engagement.
    -> Up until now, citizens and third sector actors are not routinely involved in the governance of research and innovation.
    -> Citizens and third sector actors face specific barriers to engagement in research and innovation. 

    -> Policies and practices in support of societal engagement should address questions of relevance, impact, trust, knowledge and skills, time and financial resources, and legitimacy.

  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2018). Mitreden? Ja, wenn wir auch gehört werden! ITA-Dossier Nr. 32 (März 2018; AutorInnen: Anja Bauer, Daniela Fuchs, Alexander Bogner). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-032
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB Abstract

    -> Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) fordert die kontinuierliche gesellschaftliche Beteiligung an Forschung und Innovation.
    -> BürgerInnen und zivilgesellschaftliche Organisationen sehen sich mit spezifischen Hindernissen für die Beteiligung konfrontiert.
    -> Politiken und Praktiken zur Unterstützung der gesellschaftlichen Beteiligung sollten sich mit Fragen der Relevanz, der Wirkung, des Vertrauens, des Wissens, der zeitlichen und finanziellen Ressourcen sowie der Legitimität befassen.

  • Kastenhofer, K., Bauer, A., Capari, L., Fuchs, D., Gazsó, A., Nentwich, M., Peissl, W., Sinozic, T., & Sotoudeh, M. (2018). Beratungspraxis in der TA. Tatup – Technikfolgenabschätzung In Theorie Und Praxis, 27, 80. Retrieved from http://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/106/141
    WebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2015). What´s "nano" doing in the waste? ITA-Dossier no. 18en (December 2015; Authors: Daniela Fuchs, André Gazsó). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-018en
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB Abstract

    -> An increasing number of products contain nanomaterials which end up in the waste sooner or later. To this day, their effects are still unknown.
    -> There is hardly any information on substances and quantities of nanomaterials used in mass products.
    -> This poses challenges for both Austrian waste management and legislation.
    -> Proposed solutions include the introduction of a standardised register for quantities of nanomaterials in products, consumer-friendly labelling and control of work safety in the waste sector.

  • ITA [Hrsg.],. (2015). Was macht "nano" im Müll? ITA-Dossier Nr. 18 (Dezember 2015; AutorInnen: Daniela Fuchs, André Gazsó). Wien. doi:10.1553/ita-doss-018
    DOIDownloadRISENWBIB Abstract

    -> Immer mehr Produkte enthalten Nanomaterialien. Diese landen früher oder später auch im Abfall. Wie sie sich dort verhalten, ist ungewiss.
    -> Es liegen kaum Informationen über die in Produkten eingesetzte Nanomaterialien und deren Mengen vor.
    -> Das stellt die österreichische Abfallwirtschaft und Gesetzgebung vor Herausforderungen.
    -> Lösungsansätze sind unter anderem ein einheitliches Register zur Angabe von Nanomengen in Produkten, eine verbesserte Kennzeichnung sowie die Überprüfung der Arbeitsplatzsicherheit im Abfallbereich.

  • 1

Miscellaneous

Sonstiges

  • Fuchs, D., & Nentwich, M. (2018). Die Arbeitsgruppe für Technikbewertung und ihre Folgen. TATuP. Retrieved from http://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/180
    WebsiteRISENWBIB
  • Fuchs, D., Bauer, A., & Bogner, A. (2018). Kann verantwortungsvolle Beteiligung gelingen?. TATuP – Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis. Retrieved from http://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/154/215
    WebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB
  • 1

Contact

Tel.: +43 (0)1 515 81-6597
Fax: (+43-1-) 515 81-6570
Bäckerstraße 13, 1010 Vienna
daniela.fuchs(at)oeaw.ac.at

vCard​​​​​​​