Umweltgerechte Produktion und Nachhaltige Entwicklung im Technology-Delphi Austria

PD Dr.
About
Mahshid Sotoudeh is a TA researcher with a background in chemical and process engineering. She is associate professor in the field of "technology assessment and sustainability".
Education
Born in 1963 in Tehran, she studied polymer and chemical engineering in Tehran and Vienna, graduating with honours in 1991 with a study on the modelling of mass transfer in a bioreactor for waste air treatment. Her PhD thesis on the computer aided modelling and analysis of material flow in the environment was completed in 1994. In 2010 she concluded her "habilitation" procedure at the Technical University of Graz and received the venia legendi in "technology assessment and sustainability."
Experience
From 1991 to 1994, Mahshid was research and teaching assistant at the Vienna University of Technology, working on sustainable development and interdisciplinary modelling in environmental engineering. She moved to the Chemistry and Environment Research Institute in 1994 and continued her work on the modelling of material flows in natural and industrial systems. In 1998 she started work at the ITA in the field of technology and sustainability.
She has become increasingly interested in interdisciplinary research for the analysis of complex issues at the interface between technology, environment and society. Her first research topics included clean technologies, innovation in the chemical industry and the adoption of environmental technologies, integrated environmental technologies in the cement industry and refineries, renewable resources and bioplastics. After a number of projects on the TA of innovative environmental technologies, in recent years she has become involved in a broader approach towards sustainability at national and international level. These issues include technical education for sustainable development, aging society, sustainable urban regions, Parliamentary TA, participatory methods and foresight.
Among others she is a member of the editorial board of the Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice (TATuP).
Projects
TA Projects
Selected Publications
Among her numerous publications, the book Technical education for sustainability, An analysis of needs in the 21st century and her contributions to TA in teaching are particularly noteworthy.
Refereed Contributions
Refereed Contributions
- (2021). Paradigms to assess the human health risks of nano- and microplastics. Microplastics And Nanoplastics, 2021, 1-27. doi:10.1186/s43591-021-00011-1.
- (2021). Democratising utopian thought in participatory agenda setting. European Journal Of Futures Research, 9,5. doi:10.1186/s40309-021-00174-3.
- (2019). Wrinkles and Smiles — What is Good Aging? A Technology Assessment Perspective. Obm Geriatrics, 3, 26. doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1902058.
- (2018). Participatory foresight for technology assessment – Towards an evaluation approach for knowledge co-creation. Tatup – Technikfolgenabschätzung In Theorie Und Praxis, 27, 53-59. Retrieved from http://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/135/199.
- (2017). Into Blue Skies – Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation as Socially Robust Tools for Visioneering Socio-technical Change. Nanoethics, 11, 93-106. Retrieved from http://http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0284-7.WebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract
Expectations play a distinctive role in shaping emerging technologies and producing hype cycles when a technology is adopted or fails on the market. To harness expectations, facilitate and provoke forward-looking discussions, and identify policy alternatives, futures studies are required. Here, expert anticipation of possible or probable future developments becomes extremely arbitrary beyond short-term prediction, and the results of futures studies are often controversial, divergent, or even contradictory; thus they are contested. Nevertheless, such socio-technical imaginaries may prescribe a future that seems attainable to those involved in the visioneering process, and other futures may thus become less likely and shaping them could become more difficult. This implies a need to broaden the debate on socio-technological development, creating spaces where policy, science, and society can become mutually responsive to each other. Laypeople’s experiential and value-based knowledge is highly relevant for complementing expertise to inform socially robust decision-making in science and technology. This paper presents the evolution of a transdisciplinary, forward-looking co-creation process — a demand-side approach developed to strengthen needs-driven research and innovation governance by cross-linking knowledge of laypeople, experts, and stakeholders. Three case studies serve as examples. We argue that this approach can be considered a method for adding social robustness to visioneering and to responsible socio-technical change.
- (2017). Contributing to an European imaginary of democratic education by engaging multiple actors in shaping responsible research agendas. Special Issue 'Participatory Methods for Information Society'. Public Philosophy & Democratic Education, 5, 29-50. doi:10.14746/fped.2016.5.2.20.DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract
Traditionally, expert-based forward looking has been applied to anticipate future challenges, solutions and strategic decisions, but limitations to this approach have become obvious – especially when considering long term perspectives – e.g. failing to include a comprehensive array of opinions. Aiming at producing sustainable strategies for responsible socio-technical change, research funding can benefit from combining forward looking and public participation to elicit socially robust knowledge from consulting with multi-actors, including citizens. In this paper, we give insights into the EU project CIMULACT – Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020. In CIMULACT, more than 4500 citizens, stakeholders and experts from 30 European countries engaged online and offline to co-create research topics. These are supposed to serve as input for the next round of calls in Horizon 2020, national research agendas as well as the ninth framework programme in the making. We investigate key results of this transdisciplinary process focussing on the topic “democratic education” with regard to two levels: What issues concerning the topic were raised? Can we find a common European imaginary for “democratic education”? Our analysis shows that the results contribute to defining and describing challenges for the currently prevailing imaginary of democratic education in Europe.
- (2017). CIVISTI – A forward-looking method based on citizens’ visions. Special Issue 'Participatory Methods for Information Society'. Public Philosophy & Democratic Education, 5, 73-86. doi:10.14746/fped.2016.5.2.22.
- (2017). Transdisciplinary forward-looking agenda setting for age-friendly, human centered cities. Futures, 90, 16-30. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.005.
- (2013). Assistive technologies: Their development from a technology assessment perspective. Gerontechnology, 11, 521-533. doi:10.4017/gt.2013.11.4.015.00.
- (2012). Forward-looking activities: incorporating citizens´ visions. Poiesis & Praxis. doi:10.1007/s10202-012-0121-6.DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB Abstract
Looking back on the many prophets who tried to predict the future as if it were predetermined, at first sight any forward-looking activity is reminiscent of making predictions with a crystal ball. In contrast to fortune tellers, today’s exercises do not predict, but try to show different paths that an open future could take. A key motivation to undertake forward-looking activities is broadening the information basis for decision-makers to help them actively shape the future in a desired way. Experts, laypeople, or stakeholders may have different sets of values and priorities with regard to pending decisions on any issue related to the future. Therefore, considering and incorporating their views can, in the best case scenario, lead to more robust decisions and strategies. However, transferring this plurality into a form that decision-makers can consider is a challenge in terms of both design and facilitation of participatory processes. In this paper, we will introduce and critically assess a new qualitative method for forward-looking activities, namely CIVISTI (Citizen Visions on Science, Technology and Innovation; www.civisti.org), which was developed during an EU project of the same name. Focussing strongly on participation, with clear roles for citizens and experts, the method combines expert, stakeholder and lay knowledge to elaborate recommendations for decision-making in issues related to today’s and tomorrow’s science, technology and innovation. Consisting of three steps, the process starts with citizens’ visions of a future 30–40 years from now. Experts then translate these visions into practical recommendations which the same citizens then validate and prioritise to produce a final product. The following paper will highlight the added value as well as limits of the CIVISTI method and will illustrate potential for the improvement of future processes.
- (2010). Impact assessment as a means to train future engineers for sustainable development. Gaia, 58-60..
- (2010). Technical Universities for Sustainable Development – Learning to Deal with Complexity. Gaia, 33-36..
- (2010). The Contribution of University Curricula to Engineering Education for Sustainable Development. Gaia, 19, 44-51..
- (2008). Participative Approaches for “Technology and Autonomous Living”. In K. Miesenberger (Ed.), ICCHP 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 5105 (pp. 78-81). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_10.
- (2005). Links between sustainability and technology development. Ieee Technology And Society Magazine, 24, 9-14..
- (2004). Manufactures' response to the needs of users of integrated membrane technology. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 815-826..
- (2003). Participatory methods: a tool for the improvement of innovative environmental technologies. International Journal Of Environmental Technology And Management, 336-348..RISENWBIB Abstract
This paper discusses participatory methods as a tool with which to overcome some underlying barriers to the development of innovative environmental technologies. These methods may not only promote a better comprehension of society’s needs and an improved understanding of user requirements, but also generate discussions and co-operation between relevant groups (industrial scientists, members of the scientific community, company managers, politicians, assessors, investors, etc.). Participatory approaches with transparent and clearly defined goals, a well-organised process and the integration of relevant policy fields can contribute to successful communication between actors in the interest of the development of innovative environmental technologies.
Articles/Book contributions
Articles/Book contributions
- (2021). TA in Unternehmen. In S. Böschen, Grunwald, A., Krings, B. -J., & Rösch, C. (Eds.), Technikfolgenabschätzung. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis (pp. 165-177). Baden-Baden: nomos. Retrieved from https://www.nomos-shop.de/nomos/titel/technikfolgenabschaetzung-id-86454/.
- (2020). Informationsmaterial als normative Herausforderung für partizipative TA. In R. Lindner, Decker, M., Ehrensperger, E., Heyen, N. B., Lingner, S., Scherz, C., & Sotoudeh M., (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Transformationen: Gegenstand oder Aufgabe der Technikfolgenabschätzung? (pp. 256-264). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Retrieved from https://www.nomos-shop.de/titel/gesellschaftliche-transformationen-id-86476/.
- (2019). Mission Control?. Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie Und Praxis, 79-80. Retrieved from https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/issue/view/96/99.
- (2019). Information sharing and privacy as a socio-technical phenomenon. Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie Und Praxis (Tatup), 28, 68-71. Retrieved from https://tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/3266/5840.
- (2018). Grand Challenges meistern – der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung. (M. Decker, Lindner, R., Lingner, S., Scherz, C., & Sotoudeh, M., Eds.), NTA7 Proceedings: "Grand Challenges" meistern – der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Baden-Baden: Nomos – edition sigma. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845283562-11.
- (2018). Bedürfnisorientierte Forschung, Technologie und Innovation – Eine europaweite Multiakteurskonsultation zu Horizon 2020. (M. Decker, Lindner, R., Lingner, S., Scherz, C., & Sotoudeh, M., Eds.), NTA7 Proceedings: "Grand Challenges" meistern – der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Baden-Baden: Nomos – edition sigma. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845283562-11.
- (2018). Jugendforum „Umweltbewusster Konsum und Online-Handel“. (M. Decker, Lindner, R., Lingner, S., Scherz, C., & Sotoudeh, M., Eds.), NTA7 Proceedings: "Grand Challenges" meistern – der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Baden-Baden: Nomos – edition sigma. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845283562-11.
- (2017). Editorial. Tatup – Technikfolgenabschätzung In Theorie Und Praxis, 26, 3. Retrieved from http://www.tatup.de/?journal=tatup&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=57&path%5B%5D=104.
- (2017). TA17 – Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt. Tatup – Technikfolgenabschätzung In Theorie Und Praxis, 26, 78-80. Retrieved from http://www.tatup.de/?journal=tatup&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=75&path%5B%5D=133.
- (2017). Technologie und Altern. Das Österreichische Gesundheitswesen Ökz, 58, 36-37. Retrieved from http://www.schaffler-verlag.com/medien/oekz/58-jg-2017/58-jg-2017-6-7/.
- (2017). Aktuelle Bücher aus dem ITA. Tatup – Technikfolgenabschätzung In Theorie Und Praxis, 26, 87-88. Retrieved from http://www.tatup.de/?journal=tatup&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=36&path%5B%5D=86.
- (2016). Innovation und Alter. In U. Bechtold, Waibel, U., & Sotoudeh, M. (Eds.), DiaLogbuch AAL – Dialoge zu Active and Assisted Living (pp. 71-114). Wien: OCG. Retrieved from https://shop.ocg.at/de/books/dialogbuch-aal.html.
- (2016). Participatory Foresight. Experiences with a Qualitative Demand-Side Approach. (C. Scherz, Michalek, T., Hennen, L., Hebáková, L., Hahn, J., & Seitz, S., Eds.). Prague: Technology Centre ASCR. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/pacita/pacita-2015-conference-proceedings.pdf.
- (2015). Future foods – a transdisciplinary prospect of the (Austrian) food system. (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture (Zagreb), Ed.)..
- (2015). Technikfolgenabschätzung und 'Responsible Innovation'. Konvergente Perspektiven verantwortlicher Forschungs- und Innovationsgestaltung. In A. Bogner, Decker, M., & Sotoudeh, M. (Eds.), Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS) (Tran.), Responsible Innovation – Neue Impulse für die Technikfolgenabschätzung? (pp. 11-27). Baden-Baden: Nomos/edition sigma..
- (2015). Ein Schritt vor der Innovation. Eine partizipative vorausschauende Studie zu selbstbestimmtem Leben im Alter. In A. Bogner, Decker, M., & Sotoudeh, M. (Eds.), Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS) (Tran.), Responsible Innovation – Neue Impulse für die Technikfolgenabschätzung? (pp. 241-249). Baden-Baden: Nomos/edition sigma. doi:10.5771/9783845272825-241.
- (2015). PACITA-Fallstudie 'Teleassistenz in einer alternden Gesellschaft'. Ein Szenario-Workshop mit Stakeholder-Beteiligung. In A. Bogner, Decker, M., & Sotoudeh, M. (Eds.), Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS) (Tran.), Responsible Innovation – Neue Impulse für die Technikfolgenabschätzung? (pp. 369-377). Baden-Baden: Nomos/edition sigma..
- (2015). Citizens' Visions on Active Assisted Living. In D. Hayn, Schreier, G., Ammenwerth, E., & Hörbst, A. (Eds.), eHealth2015 – Health Informatics Meets eHealth (pp. 43-49). Amsterdam: IOS Press. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-524-1-43.DOIWebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract
People aged 65 years and older are the fastest growing section of the population in many countries. Great hopes are projected on technology to support solutions for many of the challenges arising from this trend, thus making our lives more independent, more efficient and safer with a higher quality of life. But, as research and innovation ventures are often closely linked to the market, their focus may lead to biased planning in research and development as well as in policymaking with severe social and economic consequences. Thus the main research question concerned desirable settings of ageing in the future from different perspectives. The participatory foresight study CIVISTI-AAL cross-linked knowledge of lay persons, experts and stakeholders to include a wide variety of perspectives and values into productive long-term planning of research and development. Results include citizens’ visions for autonomous living in 2050, implicitly and explicitly containing basic needs towards technological, social and organizational development as well as recommendations for implementation. Conclusions suggest that personalized health and living environments play an important part in the lay persons’ view of aging in the future, but only if technologies support social and organizational innovations and yet do not neglect the importance of social affiliation and inclusion.
- (2015). Modelle für die Gestaltung umweltfreundlicher Technologien und ihre Befragbarkeit – Eine Reflexion über den Beitrag von Bernd Mahr, 26, 404-406..
- (2014). Vom "guten Leben" mit neuen Technologien: Technikfolgenabschätzung als Lernexperiment. In S. ; B. Bellucci Stefan, Decker, M., Nentwich, M., Rey, L., & Sotoudeh, M. (Eds.), Technikfolgenabschätzung im politischen System. Zwischen Konfliktbewältigung und Technologiegestaltung (pp. 75-82). Berlin: Edition Sigma..
Books/Editorships
Books/Editorships
- (2021). Gesellschaftliche Transformationen. Gesellschaftliche Transformationen (p. 428). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Retrieved from https://www.nomos-shop.de/nomos/titel/gesellschaftliche-transformationen-id-99135/.
- (2018). „Grand Challenges“ meistern: Der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung. „Grand Challenges“ meistern: Der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung (p. 420). Baden-Baden: Nomos – edition sigma. doi:10.5771/9783845283562-11.
- (2016). DiaLogbuch AAL – Dialoge zu Active and Assistive Living. DiaLogbuch AAL – Dialoge zu Active and Assistive Living (p. 287). Wien: OCG. Retrieved from https://shop.ocg.at/de/books/dialogbuch-aal.html.WebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract
Active and Assisted Living (AAL) bezieht sich auf den Einsatz von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien in den Bereichen Gesundheit, Mobilität, Kommunikation, Arbeit und Pflege mit besonderer Beachtung der Bedürfnisse älterer Menschen. Dabei zielt AAL darauf ab, Dienstleistungen und Technologien zur Verfügung zu stellen, die das Wohlbefinden, die Autonomie und die Sicherheit älterer Menschen, sowie deren Gesundheit und soziale Integration, erhalten und verbessern.
- (2015). Responsible Innovation. Neue Impulse für die Technikfolgenabschätzung? (p. 395). Baden-Baden: Nomos/edition sigma. Retrieved from http://www.oeaw.ac.at/ita/publikationen/buecher/responsible-innovation/.WebsiteRISENWBIB Abstract
„Responsible Research and Innovation“ (RRI) ist zu einem wichtigen Schlagwort der EU-Forschungspolitik geworden. Das Ziel: Technische Innovationen sollen sich an ethischen und gesellschaftlichen Erfordernissen orientieren und nicht allein durch kommerzielle Interessen bestimmt sein. RRI verlangt daher nach einer frühzeitigen Einbindung der Technikfolgenabschätzung (TA) in Innovationsprozesse. Doch was kann die TA in diesem Rahmen leisten? Und wie tragfähig ist das Konzept von RRI überhaupt?
Die in diesem Band versammelten Beiträge zeigen, welche Rolle das Konzept RRI im europäischen Kontext spielt, welche Bezüge es zwischen RRI und TA gibt und wo die Grenzen von RRI liegen. Damit wendet sich dieser Band an Entscheidungsträger in Politik und Industrie, die je unterschiedliche Phasen des Innovationsprozesses begleiten. Schließlich ist das Buch auch für die interessierte Öffentlichkeit von Interesse, denn deren Rolle wird in der RRI besonders hervorgehoben, um gesellschaftlich wünschenswerte Innovationen zu realisieren. - (2014). Technikfolgenabschätzung im politischen System. Zwischen Konfliktbewältigung und Technologiegestaltung. Technikfolgenabschätzung im politischen System. Zwischen Konfliktbewältigung und Technologiegestaltung (p. 262). Berlin: Edition Sigma..
- (2010). GAiA focus: Engineering Education in Sustainable Development. (M. Sotoudeh, Ed., Verein Gaia, Tran.), GAiA (pp. 33-60). Konstanz/St. Gallen/Zürich: oekom Verlag..
- (2009). Technical Education for Sustainability. An Analysis of Needs in the 21st Century. (W. L. Filho, Tran.), Technical Education for Sustainability: An Analysis of Needs in the 21st Century (p. 244). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften..
Research Reports
Research Reports
- (2015). Training material and prompting material – Manual National Citizen Vision Workshops. Deliverable D1.1 for the EU-project CIMULACT – Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020. Vienna..
- (2015). Teleassistenz in einer alternden Gesellschaft. Von gedachten Szenarien zu realen Empfehlungen (PACITA Kurzbericht) (p. 31). doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-e25-3.
- (2014). PACITA Deliverable 6.6: National report – Scenario workshop in Austria (p. 50). doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-e25-2.
- (2012). PACITA Deliverable 2.2: TA Practices in Europa (p. 223). Retrieved from http://www.pacitaproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/TA-Practices-in-Europe-final.pdf.
- (2011). CIVISTI – Final Project Report (p. 54). Retrieved from http://www.civisti.org/files/images/Civisti_Final_Report.pdf.
- (2010). Zweites österreichisches BürgerInnenforum – EU FP7-CIVISTI-Bericht. Wien. Retrieved from http://www.civisti.org/files/images/CIVISTI_CC2_23112010final-german-s.pdf.
- (2010). Second Austrian CIVISTI-Citizen Consultation – EU FP7-CIVISTI-Bericht. Wien. doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-c23-2.
- (2010). Informationsbroschüre BürgerInnenforum II – EU FP7-CIVISTI-Informationsmaterial. Wien. Retrieved from http://www.civisti.org/../images/CIVISTI%20National%20Vision%20Catalogue-Austria1.pdf.
- (2010). World-Wide Views on Global Warming Austria – Ein Prozess Partizipativer Technikfolgenabschätzung am Beispiel Globaler Erwärmung (p. 111). Wien. doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-d36.
- (2009). Katalog österreichischer Visionen. BürgerInnenforum I (p. 29). Wien. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-projektberichte/d2-2c23-1.pdf.
- (2008). Participatory approaches for technology and autonomous living – Project Report 'pTA Aging' (p. 58). Wien. doi:/10.553/ITA-pb-d34.DOIWebsiteDownloadRISENWBIB Abstract
The study aims to identify important actor groups and the relevant topics according to their perceptions. Thereby a focus was put on the identification of topics which define the social and organisational context of innovative technical solutions for autonomous living of older adults. In the context of the study also potential pitfalls that should be prevented in the course of the programme were identified.
- (2006). Energy transition in Europe. An overview of status and policy strategies for transforming European energy systems. Oslo. doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-d30.
- (2006). Fachbeirat für Umwelttechnologien. Eine nationale Aktivität zur Implementierung des ETAP. Endbericht September 2006. doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-d28.
- (2006). Techpol 2.0: Awareness - Partizipation - Legitimität. Vorschläge zur partizipativen Gestaltung der österreichischen Technologiepolitik. Endbericht September. doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-e15-2.
- (2006). Sectorial Background Studies (Agriculture)..
- (2006). Barriers and drivers to innovation. Case study "biorefinery combined with biogas"..
- (2006). Policy Instruments encourage innovaton, Case study "biorefinery combined with biogas"..
- (2006). Performance Targets in Production Processes, Final report May 2006, Vienna: Institut of Technology Assessment, Austrian Academy of Sciences. (From IPTS not yet approved for public use.). Vienna..
- (2006). Techpol 2.0: Awareness - Partizipation - Legitimität. Vorschläge zur partizipativen Gestaltung der österreichischen Technologiepolitik. Zwischenbericht März. doi:/10.1553/ITA-pb-e15-1.
- (2005). Zwischenbericht Fachbeirat Umwelttechnologie. Wien..
Conference Papers/Speeches
Conference Papers/Speeches
-
21/05/2002
Schidler, S. Sotoudeh. M.
Nutzung nachwachsender Rohstoffe und ihre Auswirkungen – Verdeckte Chancen und Risken vor dem Hintergrund nachhaltiger Entwicklung
Vortrag auf der TA'02, Wien 21.5.
Other Lecture -
15/01/2002
Sotoudeh, M.
Bewertung von innovativen Technologien – Komplexe Zusammenhänge und gesellschaftliche Ambivalenz
15.1., Arbeitskreis Biogene Rohstoffe, BMLFUW
Other Lecture
Short Articles
Short Articles
- (2009). Ein Blick in die Zukunft - CIVISTI Magazin (dt. Version). (L. Klüver, Ed., ITA (Institut für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung), Tran.). Wien..
- (2009). Wann TA? Technikfolgenabschätzung im Zeitalter der Technowissenschaften. Ita-Newsletter, 2-8. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0609.pdf#2.
- (2009). Das Projekt WWViews im Reality Check. Ita-Newsletter, 9 f.Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0609.pdf#9.
- (2009). BürgerInnenbeteiligung in der Technologiepolitik. Ita-Newsletter, 6 f.Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0309.pdf#6.
- (2008). Technische Ausbildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung: EESD 2008. Ita-Newsletter, 12. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL1208.pdf#12.
- (2008). Was ist Risiko?. Wien: ÖAW. Retrieved from http://www.oeaw.ac.at/home/thema/thema_200812_2.html.
- (2008). Was technische Geräte für das Leben im Alter leisten, 3-4. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0308.pdf#3.
- (2008). Klimawandel aus Sicht österreichischer BürgerInnen. Ita-Newsletter, 16. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0608.pdf.
- (2008). Informationstechnologie für medizinische Dienstleistungen. Ita-Newsletter, 18-19. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0608.pdf.
- (2008). Technische Ausbildung auf dem Weg zur Nachhaltigkeit, 10. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0308.pdf#10.
- (2007). Technikfolgenäbschätzung zwischen Inter- und Transdisziplinarität. Ita-Newsletter, 2-7. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0607.pdf#2.
- (2007). Ist Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung gleich Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, 16. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0607.pdf#16.
- (2007). Chance nachwachsender Rohstoffe, 8-9. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0907.pdf.
- (2007). Folgenabschätzung für Rechtsvorschriften, 10. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0307.pdf#10.
- (2007). Technische Ausbildung zwischen lokalem Engagement und globaler Verantwortung, 6. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0307.pdf#6-1.
- (2006). Energiepolitik in Europa auf dem Prüfstand, 3-4. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL1206.pdf#3.
- (2006). Nachhaltigkeit in der technischen Ausbildung, 10. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL1206.pdf#10.
- (2006). Umweltinnovation in der Diskussion, 4-5. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0906.pdf#4.
- (2006). TA'06: Potenziale und Risiken zur zunehmenden Datenverfügbarkeit auf dem Prüfstand der Technikfolgenabschätzung, 2-6. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0606.pdf#2.
- (2006). EPTA-Practitioners' Treffen: Europäische TA-Perspektiven, 11. Retrieved from http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-newsletter/NL0606.pdf#11-1.
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
- (2016). Transdisciplinary Foresight – Co-Creating Research Agendas Using Multi-Actor Engagement. (European Foresight Platform, Ed.). Retrieved from http://www.foresight-platform.eu/brief/efp-brief-no-262-transdisciplinary-foresight-co-creating-research-agendas-using-multi-actor-engagement/.
- (2001). UN Gipfeltreffen für Nachhaltige Entwicklung – Höchste Zeit für die Vorbereitung;, ITA-Newsltter März 2001..
Contact
Tel.: (+43-1-) 51581-6590
Fax: (+43-1-) 51581-6570
Bäckerstraße 13, 1010 Vienna
msotoud(at)oeaw.ac.at
vCard