The goal of this project was to involve Europe's citizens in shaping a sustainable as well as desirable future. Citizens of 30 countries delivered a unique contribution to shaping the European Union’s research and innovation agenda.
CIMULACT stands for 'Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020'. The project engaged more then a thousand citizens in 30 countries in Europe, along with a variety of other actors, in shaping a desirable, sustainable future. In a highly participatory process, the project provided a unique contribution to European research and innovation policies and topics, created dialogue and shared understanding among the actors, and built strong capacities in citizen engagement, thereby enhancing responsible research and innovation (RRI) in the EU.
Das ITA lud 40 in Österreich wohnhafte Personen zum BürgerInnen-Visionen Workshop ein. Die Teilnehmenden haben gemeinsam Visionen für eine nachhaltige und wünschenswerte Zukunft entwickelt. Dabei wählten sie jene Aspekte aus, die aus ihrer Sicht am wichtigsten sind, wenn es darum geht sich eine gute und lebenswerte Zukunft vorzustellen.
Ziel von CIMULACT war es, gemeinsam konkrete Visionen zu entwickeln. Sie sollten die Basis für europäische Forschungsprogramme sein die so gestaltet sind, dass sie auch den Interessen der Allgemeinheit Rechnung tragen. Der BürgerInnen-Visionen Workshop in Wien fand am Freitag, 27. November 2015 statt. Die nach festgesetzten Kriterien ausgewählten Teilnehmenden stellten einen möglichst diversen Querschnitt der Bevölkerung dar.
Jedes der 30 europäischen Länder, die an CIMULACT teilnahmen, führten einen standardisierten BürgerInnen-Visionen Workshop mit ca. 40 TeilnehmerInnen durch. So haben mehr als tausend Menschen Visionen für eine wünschenswerte Zukunft im Jahr 2050 formuliert. Es war ein kreativer Prozess, der auch dazu diente sich die Frage zu stellen, was die Visionen der BürgerInnen konkret bedeuten könnten: Was würden Menschen der Zukunft essen, welche Technologien gäbe es und wie würden diese den Alltag bestimmen? Wie würde das Verhältnis Mensch-Umwelt aussehen, welche Regulierungen würde es geben?
Die Ergebnisse - also 179 Visionen aus 30 Ländern - wurden in nationalen Berichten zusammengefasst und schließlich zusammengeführt. So konnten Unterschiede in den verschiedenen Ländern ebenso wie Ähnlichkeiten oder widersprüchliche Vorstellungen dargestellt werden. Im nächsten Schritt befassten sich ExpertInnenen, BürgerInnen und VertreterInnenn von verschiedenen Interessensgruppen mit den Ergebnissen. Sie hatten die Aufgabe, Wünsche, Hoffnungen und Befürchtungen der BürgerInnen in konkrete Forschungsthemen und Inputs für Forschungsprogrammen zu transformieren. Diese Vorschläge wurden schließlich der EU-Kommission, den nationalen Parlamenten und EntscheidungsträgerInnen sowie den nationalen Forschungsförderungsagenturen präsentiert.
Traditionally, expert-based forward looking has been applied to anticipate future challenges, solutions and strategic decisions, but limitations to this approach have become obvious – especially when considering long term perspectives – e.g. failing to include a comprehensive array of opinions. Aiming at producing sustainable strategies for responsible socio-technical change, research funding can benefit from combining forward looking and public participation to elicit socially robust knowledge from consulting with multi-actors, including citizens. In this paper, we give insights into the EU project CIMULACT – Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020. In CIMULACT, more than 4500 citizens, stakeholders and experts from 30 European countries engaged online and offline to co-create research topics. These are supposed to serve as input for the next round of calls in Horizon 2020, national research agendas as well as the ninth framework programme in the making. We investigate key results of this transdisciplinary process focussing on the topic “democratic education” with regard to two levels: What issues concerning the topic were raised? Can we find a common European imaginary for “democratic education”? Our analysis shows that the results contribute to defining and describing challenges for the currently prevailing imaginary of democratic education in Europe.
-> Science, technology and innovation (STI) should increasingly contribute to solving societal problems.
-> Orienting STI towards societal needs is necessary.
-> Research programmes can therefore benefit greatly from open, participatory agenda-setting in which citizens, experts, policy-makers and other stakeholders co-create objectives.
-> Forschung, Technologie und Innovation (FTI) soll vermehrt einen Beitrag zur Lösung gesamtgesellschaftlicher Probleme leisten.
-> Die Orientierung von FTI an gesellschaftlichen Bedürfnissen ist dabei notwendig.
-> Forschungsprogramme können daher sehr von offenem, partizipativem Agenda-Setting profitieren, in dem BürgerInnen, ExpertInnen, EntscheidungsträgerInnen und andere Interessensgruppen gemeinsam Zielsetzungen erarbeiten.
Current governance structures are increasingly showing inability to address complex issues such as the Grand Challenges. Dealing with these highly interrelated, cross cutting, extensive and potentially open ended issues requires research, development and innovation to be oriented towards societal needs and demands. Here, developing and applying sustainable long term strategies for socio-technical change on the basis of socially robust knowledge seems inevitable and using the tools of anticipatory governance—forward looking and participation—is essential in order to govern innovation actively and responsibly. Yet, expert-based forward looking has its limits, especially when considering long term perspectives, and may fail to include all necessary opinions. Thus, stakeholder engagement has become a norm over the last decades, but including laypeople into forward looking science, technology and innovation (STI) governance is underexplored. Here, strategy and policy programme development may be well suited to function as early entry point for public needs and values into the innovation process. This paper will briefly review the theoretical basis for transdisciplinary forward looking and provide first insights into an ongoing highly deliberative and reflexive foresight and co-creation process engaging science, society and policy makers, CIMULACT—Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon2020. We will especially focus on the role of technology within a collective visioning exercise that allowed for shared explorations of desirable futures, thereby collecting tacit knowledge as well as social needs and values. Integrating these with stakeholders’ and experts’ knowledge serves for co-creating socially robust knowledge for orienting policy and strategy programming towards needs based science, technology and innovation.