Colonial and postcolonial imaginaries of the Andaman Islands have represented the archipelago in the north-eastern Indian Ocean as a natural prison, a terra nullius, a site of nationalist martyrdom in the Indian anti-colonial struggle, and a repository of indigenous “exotica”.
Popular descriptions label the islands as both a “melting pot” and a “frontier”. Successive waves of migration since 1858 have created a multi-ethnic and multi-lingual mosaic referred to as “Southeast India” and “Mini-India”. Convicts incarcerated by the British were joined by partition refugees from eastern Bengal, Adivasis from Chota Nagpur, and Telugu- and Tamil-speaking migrants from southern India. The 500-odd remaining indigenous people of tribal ethnicity are confined to reserved territories, depend on government support, or refuse contact.
Strategically located at the juncture of the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea, the islands play a crucial role in India’s current military expansion with its aim to counter Chinese naval presence in the Indo-Pacific.
Once the site of British “civilising” missions, a coercive penal system, violent Japanese occupation during WWII, and a formerly thriving but now outlawed timber industry, the Andamans are the location of conflicting postcolonial imaginaries. From environmentalists’ pleas to “save” the “fragile” islands, to tourism marketing as a tropical paradise holiday destination, the Andamans are a poly-semiotic place at the friction point of centre-periphery tensions.
I focus on three questions in this research: